WTC Collapse from fire?

I dont think so. Given all the evidence, it is very easy to conclude that none of the three WTC buildings that collapsed could have even possibly collapsed in a fire.

Even if the tower was completely flooded with jet fuel, fire could not have collapsed the tower. The melting point of steel is 2750 degrees farenheit. The maximum temperature of burning jet fuel (mostly Kerosene) under optimal burning conditions is 1500 degrees farenheit. Average burning temperature of jet fuel (while in the engine, with compression) is around 800 degrees farenheit.

In order for this fire to have been capable of weakening structural steel, it would have had to be almost 2 times hotter than the maximum temperature of jet fuel. So either this plane was loaded with Hydrogen instead of passengers or this theory is total garbage.

Also the burning enviornment in the towers was far less than optimal. The amount of smoke billowing from the towers is evidence that the fires were starved for oxygen. There simply wasnt enough oxygen flowing into the building to fuel a 2750 degree fire.

Now even if the building had burned, it would not have collapsed strait down as it did. The steel would have warped and the load from the upper floors would have imbalanced the tower causing it to fall over.

Yet somehow, through some miracle of coverstory, TWO towers collapsed in this same completely impossible way? Then WTC7 collapsed a few hours later from fires as well?! Oh and the news of course reported WTC7's collapse 26 minutes before it actually collapsed. They even have it in the background as they are saying it is no longer there!?








Then you cant discount the many many many credible whitnesses that heard explosions on the ground. Im sorry, but an airplane on an upper floor causes huge explosions that can bring a skyscraper strait down without falling over? WTF? Who believes this crap?




Someone is lying...